South Sudan News Agency

Sub: Panaruu Community in Juba have rejected the security arrangements and border agreement recently signed in Addis Ababa

Juba, October 15, 2012 (SSNA) -- October, 14/ 2012. Panaruu Community of Panrieng County, Unity State in Juba have rejected the recent security and border agreement signed in Addis Ababa between the republic of south Sudan and North Sudan. This comes after the Sunday community meeting at South Sudan Hotel One. The meeting comes before one day of Presidential address of the parliament to ratify the agreement signed on September 27, 2012 after marathon summit between the two Presidents of South Sudan and North Sudan.

Panaruu Community seconded other agreements even if we have some reservations about the overall context and their future applications with the exception of security arrangements and Soft border agreement. Panaruu Community was first equally affected in numerous ways during the war, equally contributed during the war, and will be first affected if any eventuality takes place between South-North areas as it recently happened during the 10 days war of Panthou.

And because of these reasons, we strongly believe that Panaruu Community is equal stake holder like other border communities and they should not be ignored, but be included in any process so that workable, lasting and durable solutions be reached. Exclusive and discriminatory policies of the past should be avoided so that we live in a country that belongs to all of us, not theoretically, but in practicality. We therefore want the government of South Sudan under the leadership of Gen. President Salva Kiir Mayardit to be a government of people, by the people, and for the people. A government that listens to its citizens was a cause for the war that claimed millions of lives during the civil war. We cannot afford to live under political, economic, social, and cultural deprivation as it happened under former successive regimes of Khartoum before South Sudan become independent in July 2011.

Panaruu Community meeting resolved the followings:

Panaruu Community recommended the following:

Thanks,

Signed by:

Dear Mr. President:

October 12, 2012 (SSNA) -- Aweil Community, both at home and in the Diaspora, has received the 27 September Security Agreement on the 14- mile area with an indisputable displeasure and outrage. To our surprise, we have found out that the land that has never been a disputed area has now been made a disputed one. We are afraid—with your administration approving the 2011 AUHIP Proposed Map on such Security Arrangements—Khartoum is now in a celebratory mode, for it knows very well that it will soon lay unqualified claim to this piece of land and the negotiating team under your leadership will find it an uphill task to deviate from the agreement you witnessed should the final border be drawn.

It is always a common norm that those who will be potentially affected by any policy and decision should be involved and engaged by government officials in discussions, negotiations, and decision-making processes. Irrefutably, Aweil Community has knowledgeable and well-informed elders and veteran politicians who should have been involved and consulted to provide a valuable information and citizenry wisdom with regards to the 14 mile area. Yet, your leadership continues to ignore this vital avenue.

We are also deeply concerned that any agreement that deprives us of our well-established ancestral and traditional connection to this land directly threatens the main pillars of peace and stability between Aweil Community and the Baggara Community. We are profoundly alarmed by the agreement that has made a land that has never been a disputed land a contentious land. Mr. President, this situation has prompted us to communicate our well-founded concerns and viewpoints to your administration with hope that they will be given a deserved consideration.

Mr. President, having been in this land for decades (if not centuries), Aweil Community cannot and will never accept this deal because we know better that this piece of land under the heated discussion has never been and will never be a part of Sudan or Darfur, for that matter. This is because the entire NBGS is inseparable from the designated 14 mile area. Historically and customarily, Aweil and the Baggara Communities know that arrangements have been made long time ago in the 19th Century between the Dinka Malual and the Baggara nomads to allow the 2

latter passage for the Kiir River waters and pastures. It did not mean then and it does not mean now that the land is disputed nor claimed by the Baggara people.

In the past, Aweil Community had only given access to the Baggara Community to bring their animals to the Kiir River waters and pastures for their survival. Gov. Malong and Aweil Community elders in their own efforts have had some traditional discussions and talks on how the Baggara Community would be allowed to bring their animals to the Kiir River. This hospitality has never been intended to make this particular area a disputed land. Rather, Aweil Community’s hospitality has been intended to make the Baggara Community survive during the dry seasons. Aweil Community has never asked the Baggara Community to pay her for grazing privileges. Dr. Dhieu Mathok Diing Wol wrote a great article “The African Union Map and 14 Miles South River Kiir” on 23 August 2012, detailing who the true owners of the area are: NBGS.

In all these discussions, our outrage should be understandable. Our grievances are many, but this petition will exclusively focus on the 14 mile issue. While we are not here to condemn you or your administration, we have decided to bring our long-ignored outcry against the 14 mile agreement to your attention. Quite frankly, Aweil Community feels an appalling history of neglect and marginalization under your administration.

Aweil People military contributions in the course of the painful liberation struggle and unwavering political support for your leadership which had finally contributed to the attainment of South Sudan Independence has never been given a due attention. This implies that Aweil Community political support and military contribution has been taken for granted. To be clear on the 14 mile issue, the Addis Ababa negotiations on the borders began on a wrong footing because Aweil Community’s legitimate viewpoints and concerns were not considered by the negotiators. Now, it is very clear that the 14 mile agreement will have direct negative impacts on Aweil Community survival if implemented.

For this reason, Aweil Diaspora Community has decided to write this message to strongly confirm our unyielding and firm support for Gov. Malong and Aweil politicians’ rejection of the 14 mile agreement by outlining the following grievances and concerns. We honestly hope that your administration will seriously take our legitimate concerns into consideration:

(1) While the discussions about the Safe Border Demilitarized Zone (SBDZ) were on-going in Addis Ababa, no one consulted the residents of the area in question yet it was reported that Sudan Government consulted Misseriya people on issue of this magnitude. Tell us, how would you feel when people discuss your affairs without involving you in the decision making process? No matter how knowledgeable Mr. Pagan Amum and the team of South Sudan negotiators were, excluding the voice of the concerned people is unjustified;

(2) Aweil People also read an alarming tendency into this decision: from the time of negotiating the CPA to the post-secession issues, Aweil Community has been sidelined in the truest sense of the word in any meaningful discussions, yet we are among the border states and all these decisions immensely affect us;

(3) Loyalty is a two-way street, remember. We have been loyal to the leadership of the SPLA/A due to the just cause of our liberation from day one; we will continue to be. Nonetheless, despite having paid so much (in blood and treasure) for the liberation of South Sudan, Aweil Community is now being asked to give up her territorial integrity to seal agreements off with Khartoum. Such is a double jeopardy or sellout of Aweil land for unknown that we cannot afford, buy into or entertain any longer. In other words, we have not fled away from this 14 mile area during the war and should not desert it now under the term of the agreement you signed. We would rather join wherever our land goes;

(4) Since Aweil Community rejected the 14 mile agreement, your administration has never publicly come out to tell the entire Aweil Community how this issue should be handled. Although Gov. Malong and other state high-profile politicians have openly come out in the condemnation of the Aweil Community’s exclusion in the negotiations, the presidency has not responded. Yet, particular individuals under your leadership continue to denote the 14 mile area as an international border; this has not only angered the greater Aweil Community but it also reflects the bullying the stakeholders in your government harbored against NBGS. Thus, your defeaning silence makes us feel that River Kiir was intentionally made a disputed area by your administration;

(5) Mr. President, Aweil Community knows very well that you are 100% aware that the part of the Kiir River that is currently targeted by the recent agreements in Addis Ababa has never been and will never be a disputed land. Aweil Community has been tremendously alarmed and shocked by the statements that some of your administration officials have recently said regarding this land. First, the Minister of Water Resources and Irrigation, Paul Mayom Akech, has publicly stated that Kiir River is a “no-man’s land.” Second, the Minister of Parliamentary Affairs, Michael Makuei Lueth, has openly stated that Kiir River is an “international border.” Third, the Minister of Information, Dr. Marial Benjamin, has also publicly mentioned that a “select committee” will be formed to educate citizens who are criticizing the Addis Ababa agreements. In spite of all these condescending comments from your officials, the presidency is shockingly tight-lipped about it all. These kinds of comments from high-ranking politicians, your silence over Aweil Community outcry against the Kiir River relinquishment and the exclusion in the negotiations imply that the 14 mile area was intentionally planned to be a demilitarized border zone (DMZ); and finally,

(6) Aweil Community was astonished to hear that part of her land was included in the negotiations of the contentious areas between South Sudan and Sudan. Mr. President, to the best of our knowledge, when the CPA terms were negotiated in Naivasha, Kenya, the 14 mile land was not included as a disputed area. The only contentious areas that were discussed by Dr. John Garang and Mr. Taha were Abyei, Blue Nile, and Nuba Mountain. Now, what made the Kiir River a disputed land under your administration?

We are aware that the package of agreements, including this issue, was passed by the Council of Ministers and that it awaits parliamentary approval on Wednesday. Mindful of the situation at the moment, Mr. President, you can avert this crisis by not requiring the parliament to rectify it but instead returning to the negotiations with Khartoum and have this issue taken off the table. And when you do go back to Addis Abba to the drawing board, we demand that you make sure 4 that at least a son or daughter of Mading Aweil is included in the negations. After all, the AU or UNSC knows perfectly well that 14-mile area was never part of the outstanding issues left off during the CPA signing. You can talk them out of it, and in the process, still come off triumphant.

However, if it so happens that our concerns and peaceful protests are ignored such that this agreement is shoved down through our throat, then the following scenarios cannot be ruled:

(1) That our unquestionable support to the party will waver upon ratification of the agreement by the national assembly;

(2) Aweil citizens, as a protest, may consider blocking the Baggara from accessing Kiir River this season;

(3) Many Aweil citizens who fought the war were prompted to join the SPLA/M because of the Baggara encroachment on their land. If the SPLM is not a party that protects our land, we will reconsider our participation upon the withdrawal of our military from Mile 14; and lastly,

(4) We will not be in a position to blame any of our citizens who maybe in readiness to interfere if all our demands go unheeded.

In sum, Mr. President, Aweil Community supports all other 8 post-secession agreements from oil production resumption to trade normalization to Abyei Referendum. The only area where we are not supporting you and are requesting for immediate reversal is the 14 mile area. Our border with Sudan lies 36 miles North of Kiir River. Even heaven knows that 14 mile area belongs to us and any attempt to talk us out of it will fail. Because we have it within power to control our destiny, not Khartoum, we thus hope that you will do the right thing.

Sincerely Yours,

Singed by:

On Behalf of Aweil Community in Diaspora

Washington, DC, October 11, 2012 (SSNA) -- The Vice President of the Republic of South Sudan Dr. Riek Machar was caught red-handed at his controversial conspiracy and rhetoric statement made at South Sudanese Community briefing in Omaha, Nebraska U.S.A on Saturday, 6^th October 2012. Dr. Machar stated that he would ban Sudan People’s Liberation Movement for Democratic Change (SPLM-DC) political party, the official and second largest political party in South Sudan, from being registered allegedly linking Dr. Lam Akol is not only the leader of SPLM-DC but also the leader of the various rebel groups fighting the government of the South Sudan.

Irresponsible statement, The SPLM-DC executive, members, sympathizers, peace, unity and Democratic lovers in the U.S. condemn in possible strong terms, a failed leadership role Dr. Machar has demonstrated. It’s apparently clear that Dr. Machar is desperate with full of ill intended motives and dishonest characters trying to mislead south Sudanese in Diaspora and the international community by portraying SPLM-DC party and its leaders as rebels.

Reliable sources and whistleblowers asserted that Dr. Machar was speaking out of the fear that he has never offered a tangible, achievable, nor specific solutions for the outcry of the South Sudanese people for the last seven years of his term in the office and that he is worried the South Sudan constitution did not okay him to run for the presidency and yet he saw growing support for the opposition leader Dr. Akol which sparks him overnight negative advertisement on the opposition.

Hence, Dr Macher needs to be reminded that he did not earn the post he is holding now “vice president of the Republic of the South Sudan”; it was late Dr. John Garanga’s initiative that the present Speaker of the South Sudan Legislative Assembly (SSLA) Hon. James Wani Iga be moved to third position to create unity among the South Sudanese people. Dr. Lam Akol has been calling for the unity of South Sudanese all along, yet Dr Machar terms unity is meaningless while forgetting the fact that it was unity that tamed him and brought him to the present golden post.

We are calling upon concerned South Sudanese citizens, the embassies of American, British, French, and Germany in Juba, including international community to pay close attention to Dr Riek’s war against multi- party democracy in South Sudan. Since the United States took lead in bringing independent of South Sudan to South Sudanese, we are specifically ask the government of the United States, the world’s defender of democracy, not to allow individuals like Dr Riek Machar to lay ground for monopolistic and dictatorial ruling in the new Republic of South Sudan. We are also calling upon international community and South Sudanese to resolve to intensify persuading Dr. Riek and those who do not believe in democracy, a civilized way of managing a country, that the time is running out, every citizen’s voice must be heard.

The SPLM-DC vows to change the course in South Sudan politics by working closely with political parties, civil societies, churches, diversity and various communities that decentralized federal system of governance, prevails to create equitable distribution of powers and resources to meet the needs and wants of South Sudanese citizens who have been Suffering for the last seven years under the autocratic rule of the SPLM led-government. The SPLM-DC vows to end corruption spotlight in Juba, which ruins and devastates our economy including proposing constitutional amendments, achievement of greater autonomy and economic independency, security etc.

In addition, we hold Dr Machar equally responsible for all corruption allegations and failed system of stated-hood of South Sudan he and his boss exercised. Dr Riek needs to clean himself before calling on others to clean themselves. It was such remark that he has made in Omaha Nebraska, which left South Sudanese without system of governance. The SPLM-DC and the entire people of South Sudan should not let undemocratic minority individual suppress our democracy. Let’s all rise tall and say no to monopolistic rule and grasp democracy.

The SPLM.DC has strongly condemned statement of vice president of the Republic of South Sudan that the leader of our party must prove that he has no links with the rebel groups that operating in the country. There is no need for call to de-link our party from armed groups because our party has no links with them. It was not the first time for SPLM leadership to accuse the opposition party SPLM.DC of supporting the rebels, they have some reasons that been set up to impair the quality of objectives of their opponents, and then to destroy the value of our party.

According to Dr. Riek Machar, the vice president of South Sudan as he met with South Sudanese in USA, he has threatened the SPLM.DC, one of the largest opposition parties, and the most popular party in the Republic of South Sudan that it will not be registered if its chairman doesn’t prove that his party doesn’t assist and has no links with the rebel groups, which are fighting against the government of SPLM party’s policies in the country. The ruling party is absolutely sure that SPLM.DC has nothing to do with the rebels that fight the government; our party was created as a result of failure of the government to demonstrate democracy in the country.

Those routine accusations have contradicted with the SPLM.DC party objectives, and they were absolutely rejected before and will be rejected in the future. Furthermore, this government is still ruling its people with absolute power; it arrests and tortures its own people daily when they try to express their opinions on government’s failure policies. This unsuccessful government always tries to link SPLM.DC with rebels as an advertisement to the people of South Sudan in order to clean up its failure to make proper rules, and to protect citizen’s right.

SPLM.DC has made its position clear that it has nothing to do with the rebels, it is a government job to deal with the rebels; it was proved by our chairperson before that the objectives of the party are plain, it will work for the benefit of Southern Sudanese, and we will continue to condemn unreasonable accusations from the ruling party. SPLM party wants to skip its negligent, and its non- proper performance to address public issues. Our party will insist to speak out its rights, and to resist any SPLM party’s attempt to confine the party.

Our party would address the threats of the ruling party SPLM to international community for its attempt to diminish; its denial progress of our party; it tries to block party’s right to operation in the country, and SPLM.DC will continue to address the failure of ruling party to implement democratic system in the country. In addition to that, SPLM has shown a poor performance of governing; it has forgotten the role of government to protect its citizens and their properties, and it also fail to train its citizens to get good skills for development, and now it is applying absolute power over South Sudanese citizens. SPLM.DC party wants to ask democratic countries such as USA, UK, Canada, etc. to involvement, and support the accomplishment of democracy in the country. We will not endure the suffering of our citizens under the rules of one party, which appears of taking care of its members, and neglected the largest portions of ordinary citizens.

-----------------------------------------------------END--------------------------------------------------------